Skip to main content

Is lower ISO always better?

Confusion about the impact of ISO on an image is a very common question that comes into every photographer's mind when learning photography. ISO is often referred to as the bad guy of photography, introducing noise and grain in digital images. In contrast to this, ISO also comes to rescue when shutter speed and aperture reaches limitations to achieve a shot. I have been to that scary place of "Do not increase ISO, it causes noise" as a beginner, never went above 200 ISO for the first 3-4 months of manual mode shooting. The struggle to take handheld landscape shots at 1/10 second because ISO should stay at 100. Outcome? Blurred shots due to handshake.
Lower ISO always better?

What does ISO do?
Yes, it makes the image appear brighter and helps to achieve proper exposure by increasing the sensitivity of the sensor towards light. What happens in the background? By increasing ISO value inside the camera, the gain could happen in any of the three ways: 
-> In the sensor, by increasing voltage.
-> Via an analog amplifier outside the sensor.
-> After the signal has been digitized but before writing the raw file.
There is a lot more to image noise than just ISO value, increasing ISO is not the only source of the noise in a digital image.  We will talk in depth about digital image noise sources in a separate post. Coming back to ISO, here is a small video of how the image look varies with an increase in ISO. The first image was taken at 160 ISO and the last at 51200 ISO, notice how the last image has a lot of grain as compared to the first image.  

Is lower ISO always better?

No. A noisy photo is better than no photo, right? Or a grainy photo is better than a blurred photo, right? So lowering the ISO in camera is not always better if it causes you to miss the shot. In addition to this, a properly exposed image achieved inside the camera is better than adjusting the exposure later in Lightroom. Post-processing introduces more noise fixing an image. I did a small experiment taking a shot of my study table to show you how this works. 

Lower ISO noise comparison

Higher vs lower ISO noise

Side by side comparison of the two images shows that same level of post-processing exposure increment leads to more noise as compared to in-camera ISO increment. This comparison brings us to our new topic born out of ISO adjustment called ISO Invariance. ISO invariant sensors are also known as ISO-less sensors. ISO invariant sensors produce the same quality image whether the ISO is increased in camera or exposure is adjusted to the same level during post-processing. This means no punishment for pushing exposure later in Adobe Lightroom.
Shooting at 100 ISO and bringing up 3 stop exposure later in post-processing.
Shooting at 800 ISO and no post-processing exposure change.

Even though a camera is too close to being ISO invariant, it is still precarious to shoot at base ISO. Shooting a photo at base ISO (photo is too dark to even see properly) and then later trying to recover it just because the sensor is ISO invariant is a risky deal. Did you nail the focus? Did you nail the composition? Hard to tell looking at the dark shot. Which camera sensors are ISO invariant? No camera is truly ISO invariant yet, let's be honest. If post sensor camera electronics were perfect, every camera would be ISO invariant. List of extremely close to being ISO invariant digital cameras include:
Nikon D750
Nikon D810
Sony A7 RII
Fuji XT1

Lower ISO or higher ISO better?
If there is plenty of light available, there is no need to bump the ISO a lot and introduce unwanted grain. A fast-moving action even in plenty of light would demand a fairly high shutter speed, bumping ISO higher doesn't hurt here to keep exposure balanced. Summarizing, it totally depends on the situation you are in when it comes to ISO. Reminder, a grainy shot is always better than no shot and in-focus shot better than a blurred shot. As a photographer, the main aim should be to get the shot you desire. Noise is annoying but can be minimized by simply shooting raw and doing post-processing, a blurred shot can't be recovered by the software.

What value of ISO do you feel comfortable with your camera? Would love to hear in comments.


Popular posts from this blog

sRGB vs Adobe RGB colour space explained

Digital images are everywhere, both offline and online. Each digital image is made up of a large number of square sized individual pixels. Zoom into an image at 2000 % or more in any of the viewers, you will see these pixels. Here is an example:

In order to categorize pixel colours, RGB and CMYK are the two widely used colour models. According to the RGB colour model, each pixel colour can be considered as an addition of different shades of red/green/blue light. These light shades are calculated according to the bit depth of the image. Jpeg images are usually 8 bits per colour channel (red, blue or green), which means 2^8 ( 256) different shades of each red/blue/green colour are possible. Few examples to make it clear how different colours shades are represented:
Red: (255, 0, 0)
Green: (0,255,0)
Blue: (0,0,255)
White: (255, 255, 255)
Black:  (0,0,0)

What does CMYK do? It is a subtractive colour model for printing purposes and stands for Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black. According to …

5 things to know before switching DSLR between Canon and Nikon

Photography is an expensive hobby or profession and everyone wants the best bang for every dollar they spend. This applies to any photography equipment starting with low-cost tripods to super expensive professional grade lenses. I am sure all of us must have heard of Nikon and Canon. The good old battle between these two DSLR brands will never end. Whether you are a beginner or a full time professional, there are a few quirks everyone should know before switching camera between these brands.
1) The used market for Canon gear is just enormous which makes a good plus point for investment and buying decent used gear. Go to craigslist for a given city and search used photography gear, the difference will be easily noticeable. I searched for 10 different cities in Canada and all had comparatively more listings for Canon.
2) Nikon has better dynamic range cameras. Dynamic range is the ability of the camera to sense the lightest and darkest scene in a given photo retaining as much detail as…

How to locate the milky way for night sky DSLR photography?

Our Earth is part of a huge sized galaxy, known as the Milky Way. Milky Way basically consists of our whole solar system and is made up of 100-400 billion stars. Until last year, I had no idea if we can see Milky Way with naked eyes. After a lot of failed late night drives and sleeping at the beach, I was finally able to get a grip on what I actually need to see Milky Way. In September 2016, I got my first Milky Way shot. It was an extremely emotional and priceless moment when I first saw the magnificent milky way with my own eyes. All the failed attempts or discomfort of not going to bed early seemed nothing in that moment. I would consider sharing this priceless memory with fellow photography folks as the inspiration behind this post.  Moving on to the technical part, there is a minimal amount of gear required to take Milky Way shots using your dslr. Focusing at infinity and calculating the shutter speed to avoid star trails is purely technical, capturing Milky Way takes a little mor…