Skip to main content

Is lower ISO always better?

Confusion about the impact of ISO on an image is a very common question that comes into every photographer's mind when learning photography. ISO is often referred to as the bad guy of photography, introducing noise and grain in digital images. In contrast to this, ISO also comes to rescue when shutter speed and aperture reaches limitations to achieve a shot. I have been to that scary place of "Do not increase ISO, it causes noise" as a beginner, never went above 200 ISO for the first 3-4 months of manual mode shooting. The struggle to take handheld landscape shots at 1/10 second because ISO should stay at 100. Outcome? Blurred shots due to handshake.
Lower ISO always better?

What does ISO do?
Yes, it makes the image appear brighter and helps to achieve proper exposure by increasing the sensitivity of the sensor towards light. What happens in the background? By increasing ISO value inside the camera, the gain could happen in any of the three ways: 
-> In the sensor, by increasing voltage.
-> Via an analog amplifier outside the sensor.
-> After the signal has been digitized but before writing the raw file.
There is a lot more to image noise than just ISO value, increasing ISO is not the only source of the noise in a digital image.  We will talk in depth about digital image noise sources in a separate post. Coming back to ISO, here is a small video of how the image look varies with an increase in ISO. The first image was taken at 160 ISO and the last at 51200 ISO, notice how the last image has a lot of grain as compared to the first image.  

Is lower ISO always better?

No. A noisy photo is better than no photo, right? Or a grainy photo is better than a blurred photo, right? So lowering the ISO in camera is not always better if it causes you to miss the shot. In addition to this, a properly exposed image achieved inside the camera is better than adjusting the exposure later in Lightroom. Post-processing introduces more noise fixing an image. I did a small experiment taking a shot of my study table to show you how this works. 

Lower ISO noise comparison

Higher vs lower ISO noise

Side by side comparison of the two images shows that same level of post-processing exposure increment leads to more noise as compared to in-camera ISO increment. This comparison brings us to our new topic born out of ISO adjustment called ISO Invariance. ISO invariant sensors are also known as ISO-less sensors. ISO invariant sensors produce the same quality image whether the ISO is increased in camera or exposure is adjusted to the same level during post-processing. This means no punishment for pushing exposure later in Adobe Lightroom.
Shooting at 100 ISO and bringing up 3 stop exposure later in post-processing.
Shooting at 800 ISO and no post-processing exposure change.

Even though a camera is too close to being ISO invariant, it is still precarious to shoot at base ISO. Shooting a photo at base ISO (photo is too dark to even see properly) and then later trying to recover it just because the sensor is ISO invariant is a risky deal. Did you nail the focus? Did you nail the composition? Hard to tell looking at the dark shot. Which camera sensors are ISO invariant? No camera is truly ISO invariant yet, let's be honest. If post sensor camera electronics were perfect, every camera would be ISO invariant. List of extremely close to being ISO invariant digital cameras include:
Nikon D750
Nikon D810
Sony A7 RII
Fuji XT1

Lower ISO or higher ISO better?
If there is plenty of light available, there is no need to bump the ISO a lot and introduce unwanted grain. A fast-moving action even in plenty of light would demand a fairly high shutter speed, bumping ISO higher doesn't hurt here to keep exposure balanced. Summarizing, it totally depends on the situation you are in when it comes to ISO. Reminder, a grainy shot is always better than no shot and in-focus shot better than a blurred shot. As a photographer, the main aim should be to get the shot you desire. Noise is annoying but can be minimized by simply shooting raw and doing post-processing, a blurred shot can't be recovered by the software.

What value of ISO do you feel comfortable with your camera? Would love to hear in comments.


Popular posts from this blog

Canon CR3 raw format guide

A raw image file is like a digital negative without any lossy compression and minimal processing applied to it. A digital camera shooting images in raw format provides output in the best possible quality, which means files are larger in size and take more space. The benefits offered by shooting raw format overpowers the slight storage hassle though. Few of the well known raw formats include CR2, NEF, RW2, RAF, PEF, ARW, etc.  In this post, we will talk about the new compressed raw format introduced by Canon starting with its mirrorless series of cameras.

History of Canon raw formats
Back in the early 2000s, Canon cameras produced raw photos in CRW format. Cameras shooting in CRW include Canon D60, Canon D30, Canon 10D, and Canon EOS 300D. Most of the cameras released after the year 2004 shoot raw photos in CR2 format. Examples of CR2 format Canon cameras include 350D, 6D, 7D, 5D, 5D Mark II and many more.
In 2018, Canon introduced its new mirrorless camera known as the EOS M50.  This …

Relation between ISO, shutter speed, aperture and light in photography

Photography is a word having Greek roots, which basically means "drawing with light". When I started doing digital photography a few years ago, this did not make sense to me at all. How can you make a picture just using light? Only light matters? My pictures were either black or completely washed out all the time, but I didn't feel like giving up. It took me a fair amount of time to understand controls such as shutter speed, aperture and ISO which was the outcome of non-stop reading and a lot of mistakes. Coming back to the concept of light, it started to make sense after attending a film photography workshop. The dark room with very dim or near to zero red lights was a whole new point of interest. My partner and I made a pinhole camera out of a pumpkin. 
The workshop made me understand how important light is when taking pictures, and the rules apply to both film and digital photography. Basically, the value of shutter speed and aperture directly affect the amount of li…

F2.8 vs F3.5 vs F4 lens aperture comparison with examples

I started the exciting journey of digital photography with 18-55 mm kit lens as my first glass. Being a variable aperture lens, it has a minimum aperture of F3.5 at 18 mm. The lens saw its fair share of adventures and ultimately was replaced with a fixed aperture lens.   Value of aperture is a part of the exposure triangle, which means it affects the amount of light hitting DSLR camera sensor. In addition to light, it also affects the amount of area in focus which is often referred to as Depth of Field. An image taken at F8 will have almost everything in focus when compared to an image taken at F2.8. Before someone jumps on me with their DOF vocabulary, this post is not about depth of field (DOF) in detail discussion. It is a simple comparison post for beginners to understand how lens aperture impacts background blur and low light performance. 
DSLR used: Canon 6D Lens used: Tamron 24-70 mm F2.8 DI VC USD
Bokeh (background blur) comparison:

Comparison animation in the above photo show…