Skip to main content

Fixed aperture vs variable aperture zoom lens

As a total beginner, it can be confusing to understand the meaning of F/3.5, F/5.6, F/2.8, etc. written on DSLR camera lenses. Some lenses have two F numbers, while others have only one F-number. So what's the difference between these two lenses? How do they work when changing in-camera settings?
Lenses with single F-number value like F/1.8, F/2.8, F/4, F/5.6 are known as fixed aperture lenses. Fixed aperture lenses are not to be confused with fixed focal length lenses, fixed focal length ones are called prime lenses.  Prime means the lens will only have one focal length, and all the zooming in and out part is done by the user moving physically. On the other hand, lenses with multiple values such as F/3.5-F/5.6, F/3.5-F/4.5, etc. refer to variable aperture zoom lenses. In simple words, these lenses change their widest aperture values when zoomed in or out.

variable aperture vs fixed aperture lens

Example of fixed aperture prime lenses:
Canon EF-S 24 mm F/2.8
Nikon AF-S Nikorr 85 mm F/1.4G
Nikon AF-S DX 35 mm F/1.8G
Canon EF 50 mm F/1.8 STM

Variable aperture zoom lens: F-number changes when zoomed in or zoomed out without user's permission even in Manual mode. The first value is for the lowest zoom, another one is for maximum zoom mentioned on the lens. Example: 
Canon EF-S 18-55 mm EF-S F/3.5-F/5.6
This lens will not allow the camera aperture value of less than F/3.5 at 18 mm focal length. When zoomed into the scene at 50 or 55 mm, the value of F/3.5 will change to F/5.6 due to lens optics limitation. This means in-camera aperture value will stick at a minimum of F/5.6 when zoomed in. In terms of the exposure triangle, this means less light is available to take photos. In terms of background blur (bokeh), this means lesser blur (there are other factors too). Few examples of well known variable aperture zoom lenses include: 
Canon EF 70-300 F/4-F/5.6L IS USM
Canon EF 75-300 F/4-F/5.6 III USM
Canon EF-S 55-250 F/4-F/5.6 IS STM
Canon EF-S 10-18 mm F/4.5-F/5.6 IS STM

Fixed aperture zoom lens: Zoom in or zoom out, the value of F-number will stay the same. Simply, the zoom will have no effect whatsoever on the F-number value unless the user changes it by themselves inside the camera. Few examples of well known fixed aperture zoom lenses include: 
Sigma 17-50 EF-S F/2.8 EX DC OS HSM
Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 DC HSM Art
Canon EF 70-200 F/2.8L IS II USM
Canon EF 24-70 F/2.8L II USM
Tokina AT-X Pro DX II 11-16 F/2.8
Tokina AT-X 11-20 F/2.8 Pro DX
Tokina AT-X 16-28 F/2.8 Pro FX
Canon EF 16-35 F/4L IS USM

Fixed aperture vs variable aperture lens:
Fixed aperture lenses are better as the user does not have to think about aperture getting changed just because focal length was varied. This sometimes leads to poorly exposed shots. Also, fixed aperture makes life a lot easier when shooting a fast-paced event like a wedding, sports, etc. Let's talk about a few points comparing both with each other: 
Sharpness: Fixed aperture lenses are in general more sharp than variable aperture zoom lenses. Also, most of the fixed aperture lenses are made with professional grade quality glass which naturally produces finer images.
Cost: Fixed aperture lenses are more expensive as compared to the equivalent variable aperture zoom lens. Some of the variable aperture zoom lenses are also made professional grade quality glass which makes them more expensive than equivalent lower quality glass variable aperture zoom lens.
Weight: Fixed aperture zoom lenses are heavier as compared to variable aperture DSLR lenses. This is because a lot more amount of glass is used to manufacture fixed aperture lenses.

Hope this post will help you understand your camera lenses in a better way. Share the photography love by sharing this post. :) 


  1. so if a user wants to get great clear shots of the moon (with details of the craters) a 500mm-1000mm F8.0 would be a good to have?

  2. Hi, Yes. The more the zoom, the better for moon shots. F8 (aperture) can be used in any lens, as described in the above post.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Canon CR3 raw format guide

A raw image file is like a digital negative without any lossy compression and minimal processing applied to it. A digital camera shooting images in raw format provides output in the best possible quality, which means files are larger in size and take more space. The benefits offered by shooting raw format overpowers the slight storage hassle though. Few of the well known raw formats include CR2, NEF, RW2, RAF, PEF, ARW, etc.  In this post, we will talk about the new compressed raw format introduced by Canon starting with its mirrorless series of cameras.

History of Canon raw formats
Back in the early 2000s, Canon cameras produced raw photos in CRW format. Example of cameras shooting in CRW include Canon D60, Canon D30, Canon 10D, and Canon EOS 300D. Most of the cameras released after the year 2004 shoot raw photos in CR2 format. Examples of CR2 format Canon cameras include 350D, 6D, 7D, 5D, 5D Mark II and many more.
In 2018, Canon introduced its new mirrorless camera known as the EOS …

Relation between ISO, shutter speed, aperture and light in photography

Photography is a word having Greek roots, which basically means "drawing with light". When I started doing digital photography a few years ago, this did not make sense to me at all. How can you make a picture just using light? Only light matters? My pictures were either black or completely washed out all the time, but I didn't feel like giving up. It took me a fair amount of time to understand controls such as shutter speed, aperture and ISO which was the outcome of non-stop reading and a lot of mistakes. Coming back to the concept of light, it started to make sense after attending a film photography workshop. The dark room with very dim or near to zero red lights was a whole new point of interest. My partner and I made a pinhole camera out of a pumpkin. 
The workshop made me understand how important light is when taking pictures, and the rules apply to both film and digital photography. Basically, the value of shutter speed and aperture directly affect the amount of li…

Darktable vs Lightroom Classic CC

I first heard about Darktable software in 2016 and actually was quite fascinated with the name itself.  Within a few hours of hearing about it, I went to the official Darktable website and downloaded it on my Linux machine. Have been using it for quite a while now alongside Adobe Lightroom Classic CC and hence decided to write this small review post. If you are looking for a free Adobe Lightroom alternative, this might be or might not be for you depending on what you need.  Darktable is a free open source post-processing software which can do non-destructive RAW photo editing and photo management. Non-destructive means it does not change the original RAW file, all the edits are written to a sidecar file. It has evolved through so many phases of bug fixing and operating system compatibility. The latest version is available for Linux, MacOS, and Windows. Being an open source software it doesn't surprise me that it is available in 21 language translations. That's the power of op…