Skip to main content

In-camera DSLR body image stabilization vs optical lens stabilization

I recently went on a trip and took a lot of photos using a telephoto lens that has image stabilization built into it. While taking photos, I realized I should write a blog post explaining what image stabilization basically does and how the two techniques (lens vs in-camera body) are different from each other. If you have a Canon or Nikon lens, you must have heard terms like IS (Image Stabilization for Canon) and VR(Vibration Reduction for Nikon) while buying lenses. These naming terms indicate that the lens supports image stabilization.
Image stabilization, as the name itself suggests, is a technique for reducing the effect of shake or vibration on the final image. This vibration might be coming from shaky hands, tripod leg sliding at 1 mm per second or just natural body rhythms that get magnified at higher zoom values. While Nikon and Canon are still sticking with traditional lens-based image stabilization technique to reduce shake, manufacturers like Pentax, Sony and Olympus follow a totally different methodology known as in-camera body image stabilization. 

In-Camera vs Lens stabilization on a DSLR
Image was taken using s DSLR lens with image stabilization (OIS)
A little history of Image Stabilization:
Nikon and Canon have always been into lens-based image stabilization. When Konica Minolta finally got around to make their first DSLR, they introduced sensor based in-camera body image stabilization. Pentax and Olympus followed the norm. Sony first decided to use lens-based image stabilization because it's favourable for video, thus came up with a couple of stabilized F1.8 prime lenses. After the first generation of full frame (FE) bodies, they started incorporating sensor based stabilization into their cameras. So now they have older FE bodies without in-camera body image stabilization, newer ones with it, and a mix of lenses with and without it. Quite confusing! As of today, Pentax, Sony and Olympus all prefer in-camera body image stabilization. Here is a list of best DSLR cameras with in-body image stabilization:
Pentax KS-2
Sony Alpha A7SII
Olympus E-M1
Olympus E-M5
Panasonic GX7
Pentax K-70
Panasonic GX8 has both.
Pentax K200D
Pentax K-5.

So now we know we know the best DSLR cameras with in-camera body image stabilization. If you have to make a call between in-camera body stabilization vs optical lens stabilization, what would you do? I personally would prefer having both if I had the budget, but let's discuss advantages offered by both stabilization systems.
Lens Stabilization: Also called OIS which stands for Optical Image Stabilization.
Advantages:
-Longer telephoto lenses yield better results with lens-based stabilization instead of in-camera body stabilization.
-The further zoomed in you are the better the OIS will be compared to the IBIS.
-Optical lens stabilization is visible in the viewfinder when it comes to DSLR cameras. This really gives the user an excellent idea of the picture.
-Can be used with older camera models too.

In-Camera Body Image Stabilization: Often abbreviated as IBIS. Also known by the names such as Super SteadyShot (Sony) and Shake reduction (Pentax).
Advantages:
-Even manual and legacy lenses will work with a DSLR body having in-camera stabilization. You do not have to invest in OIS based lenses every time as your camera body takes the power of stabilizing your shots.
-IBIS will stabilize your fast non-stabilized primes for low light. This will allow you to shoot handheld easily in low light.
-In-camera body image stabilization is 5 axis unlike 2 axis stabilization given by lenses. This is a bit of Maths so I will go in-depth in a separate post.
-Possible money saver as a user does not have to look for IS or VR lenses.
-Makes the lenses lighter and easy to handle.

If your low light photography shoots involve fast/quickly moving people like a nightclub or dance performance, then either technique of stabilization would be of very low value for you.  Also, do not base your DSLR buying decision solely based on image stabilization, it is not the holy grail of photography. Hope the post helped you understand what Image Stabilization basically does and the advantages of one methodology over the other one. If you found this post informative, share the photography love by sharing this post. :) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Canon CR3 raw format guide

A raw image file is like a digital negative without any lossy compression and minimal processing applied to it. A digital camera shooting images in raw format provides output in the best possible quality, which means files are larger in size and take more space. The benefits offered by shooting raw format overpowers the slight storage hassle though. Few of the well known raw formats include CR2, NEF, RW2, RAF, PEF, ARW, etc.  In this post, we will talk about the new compressed raw format introduced by Canon starting with its mirrorless series of cameras.


History of Canon raw formats
Back in the early 2000s, Canon cameras produced raw photos in CRW format. Cameras shooting in CRW include Canon D60, Canon D30, Canon 10D, and Canon EOS 300D. Most of the cameras released after the year 2004 shoot raw photos in CR2 format. Examples of CR2 format Canon cameras include 350D, 6D, 7D, 5D, 5D Mark II and many more.
In 2018, Canon introduced its new mirrorless camera known as the EOS M50.  This …

Relation between ISO, shutter speed, aperture and light in photography

Photography is a word having Greek roots, which basically means "drawing with light". When I started doing digital photography a few years ago, this did not make sense to me at all. How can you make a picture just using light? Only light matters? My pictures were either black or completely washed out all the time, but I didn't feel like giving up. It took me a fair amount of time to understand controls such as shutter speed, aperture and ISO which was the outcome of non-stop reading and a lot of mistakes. Coming back to the concept of light, it started to make sense after attending a film photography workshop. The dark room with very dim or near to zero red lights was a whole new point of interest. My partner and I made a pinhole camera out of a pumpkin. 
The workshop made me understand how important light is when taking pictures, and the rules apply to both film and digital photography. Basically, the value of shutter speed and aperture directly affect the amount of li…

F2.8 vs F3.5 vs F4 lens aperture comparison with examples

I started the exciting journey of digital photography with 18-55 mm kit lens as my first glass. Being a variable aperture lens, it has a minimum aperture of F3.5 at 18 mm. The lens saw its fair share of adventures and ultimately was replaced with a fixed aperture lens.   Value of aperture is a part of the exposure triangle, which means it affects the amount of light hitting DSLR camera sensor. In addition to light, it also affects the amount of area in focus which is often referred to as Depth of Field. An image taken at F8 will have almost everything in focus when compared to an image taken at F2.8. Before someone jumps on me with their DOF vocabulary, this post is not about depth of field (DOF) in detail discussion. It is a simple comparison post for beginners to understand how lens aperture impacts background blur and low light performance. 
DSLR used: Canon 6D Lens used: Tamron 24-70 mm F2.8 DI VC USD
Bokeh (background blur) comparison:

Comparison animation in the above photo show…