Skip to main content

Affinity photo editor vs Photoshop CC

In the last post, we talked about an open source free photo editing software called Darktable and compared it with Lightroom Classic CC.  This post we will focus on another amazing software called Affinity photo editor, developed by Serif, a company based in the UK. Affinity photo editor is available for Windows and Apple Mac machines as a software to download. Affinity photo has the RAW processing features of Lightroom and image editing features of Photoshop. I first thought of doing a comparison between Lightroom Classic CC and Affinity photo but both of them have very different functionalities, and the comparison did not produce very meaningful results. One of them is known for its digital asset management capabilities and the other for its high-end tools. 
Affinity photo is a really strong contender for Photoshop CC. Both have great RAW image support and tons of very similar tools. Here are some of the major differences between Photoshop and Affinity photo: 

-Lesser Affinity photo plugins availability as compared to Photoshop. It does support Nik collection as that's the one I personally use. 
-Affinity photo is faster than Photoshop, my personal opinion. My machine is a 500 GB SSD and 16 GB RAM with an AMD A10 processor. 
-Context-aware delete from Photoshop is called as in painting brush tool in Affinity photo editor. Both have the exact same functionality but different naming. 
-Neat selection brush. I really loved the selection brush offered in Affinity photo, it is very smooth. 
-PSD Format support. Yes, PSD files are supported by Affinity photo which could make the transition smoother in case you want to switch.
-The .afphoto native format for Affinity photo is not supported by Lightroom. This is one of the points you need to consider if you want to combine Affinity photo editor and Lightroom Classic CC in your workflow. 
-Cheaper. Even though Affinity photo cannot replace 100% of the Photoshop features, it is still an attractive option because it is available at a fraction of the standalone Photoshop pricing. If you do not like paying money every month to Adobe, Affinity photo might be worth considering. 
Affinity photo editor vs Adobe Photoshop CC
Affinity photo editor vs Photoshop CC
Both of the software are raster editors and designed for pixel manipulation, not digital asset management. If you like working with Lightroom and do not need the advanced photoshop based tools, then Affinity photo would be an overkill for you. It's a huge tool with a steep learning curve, just like Photoshop. The good thing here is Affinity photo comes with a lot of tutorials that can be accessed from the application itself which is really cool. If you need photoshop like functionalities bat cheap cost, then Affinity photo is a very close option. Adobe Photoshop has been on the market for over a decade now which is the reason for its excellent community support and wide knowledge base. Hopefully, Affinity Photo will catch up as more and more people start to use it. 

It's rumoured that Affinity is creating a new software equivalent of Lightroom. I am eagerly waiting for it to come into the photo management market. Affinity has another software called Affinity Designer which is very similar to Adobe Illustrator. Hope this post was informative enough to help you know some of the major differences between both the software. Share the photography love by sharing this post:)
Reactions:

Comments

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Canon CR3 raw format guide

A raw image file is like a digital negative without any lossy compression and minimal processing applied to it. A digital camera shooting images in raw format provides output in the best possible quality, which means files are larger in size and take more space. The benefits offered by shooting raw format overpowers the slight storage hassle though. Few of the well known raw formats include CR2, NEF, RW2, RAF, PEF, ARW, etc.  In this post, we will talk about the new compressed raw format introduced by Canon starting with its mirrorless series of cameras.


History of Canon raw formats
Back in the early 2000s, Canon cameras produced raw photos in CRW format. Cameras shooting in CRW include Canon D60, Canon D30, Canon 10D, and Canon EOS 300D. Most of the cameras released after the year 2004 shoot raw photos in CR2 format. Examples of CR2 format Canon cameras include 350D, 6D, 7D, 5D, 5D Mark II and many more.
In 2018, Canon introduced its new mirrorless camera known as the EOS M50.  This …
20 comments
Read more

Relation between ISO, shutter speed, aperture and light in photography

Photography is a word having Greek roots, which basically means "drawing with light". When I started doing digital photography a few years ago, this did not make sense to me at all. How can you make a picture just using light? Only light matters? My pictures were either black or completely washed out all the time, but I didn't feel like giving up. It took me a fair amount of time to understand controls such as shutter speed, aperture and ISO which was the outcome of non-stop reading and a lot of mistakes. Coming back to the concept of light, it started to make sense after attending a film photography workshop. The dark room with very dim or near to zero red lights was a whole new point of interest. My partner and I made a pinhole camera out of a pumpkin. 
The workshop made me understand how important light is when taking pictures, and the rules apply to both film and digital photography. Basically, the value of shutter speed and aperture directly affect the amount of li…
2 comments
Read more

F2.8 vs F3.5 vs F4 lens aperture comparison with examples

I started the exciting journey of digital photography with 18-55 mm kit lens as my first glass. Being a variable aperture lens, it has a minimum aperture of F3.5 at 18 mm. The lens saw its fair share of adventures and ultimately was replaced with a fixed aperture lens.   Value of aperture is a part of the exposure triangle, which means it affects the amount of light hitting DSLR camera sensor. In addition to light, it also affects the amount of area in focus which is often referred to as Depth of Field. An image taken at F8 will have almost everything in focus when compared to an image taken at F2.8. Before someone jumps on me with their DOF vocabulary, this post is not about depth of field (DOF) in detail discussion. It is a simple comparison post for beginners to understand how lens aperture impacts background blur and low light performance. 
DSLR used: Canon 6D Lens used: Tamron 24-70 mm F2.8 DI VC USD
Bokeh (background blur) comparison:

Comparison animation in the above photo show…
1 comment
Read more