Skip to main content

How to avoid star trails during night photography using 500 rule?

What is a star trail? Movement of star captured across several pixels of a given image leads to the formation of a star trail. This is a really common problem when doing long exposure night sky photography or astrophotography. Pretty sure most of us like to star gaze and observe those tiny little twinkling dots in the sky on a clear day. If our eyes can see it, so why not our DSLR? We want exact same tiny cute little stars to show up in our DSLR photos too. Once you have learned how to focus your DSLR lens to infinity, next thing to think about is how to avoid light pollution and star trails. 500 rule or 600 rule comes to the rescue when learning to avoid star trails. I have seen a lot of discussions about 500 rule vs 600 rule, I personally have always been happy with 500 rule only. Sometimes I even go for 400 rule but never 600 rule.
Who invented this rule? I did search but couldn't find anything relevant or meaningful. Only thing I know is all modern day astrophotography folks love this rule. I will try to explain the rule with two simple examples. If you are shooting RAw images, I would highly recommend turning off Long Exposure Noise Reduction in your camera settings menu. 

1) Canon T5i (cropped sensor) camera. 
Lens used: Tokina 11-16 F2.8 DX at 11 mm. 
ISO: 3200
F-stop: F2.8
Shutter speed:
Maximum shutter speed possible to avoid star trails: 500 divided by full frame equivalent focal length. So it is 500/(11*1.6) which gives us approx 28 seconds. 1.6 is the crop factor for Canon cropped sensor cameras, you can use 1.5 for Sony and Nikon cropped sensor cameras.

Star trails avoid during MIlky way photography
                                                                  20 seconds exposure 

2) Nikon D610 (full frame sensor) camera. 
Lens used: Tokina 16-28 F2.8 FX at 16 mm. 
ISO: 3200
F-stop: F2.8
Shutter speed calculation:
Maximum shutter speed possible to avoid star trails: 500 divided by full frame equivalent focal length. So it is 500/16 which gives us 31.25 seconds. In this case, I would use 30 seconds to be on safe side. Take a few test shots and check your image by zooming in. If you see every star looking well rounded and crispy, you have taken an awesome shot. If not, try again with a bit lower shutter speed. You might get lucky to see a couple of shooting stars in your photos which adds more interest to the pictures. 

Hope this post would help you to take stunning and crispy star shots without any surprise star trails. If you like star trails, there will be a separate post talking about cool star trail formation ideas around the north star. 

If you found this post helpful, share the photography love by sharing this post. :)


  1. Thanks for the post. That was a big help. Will try it as soon as I get hold of an appropriate lense.

  2. Photograph clicked is amazing. I will surely try these lenses and your idea of photography.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to focus at infinity doing night photography?

In the previous post, we talked about taking pictures of the moon with a DSLR. The reason for this post can be contributed to the fact that focusing on the moon is still easier as compared to stars. Also, what to do when you are in the middle of nowhere trying to take pictures of star trails, night sky, milky way, etc. It is hard to see your camera controls on a night without moon and away from city lights. I recently went on a night photography excursion with a group of photographers to do astrophotography. It was pitch dark as there was no moon at all. Here are a few things that worked for most of us when it comes to focusing, pretty sure at least one of them would work for you.
1) Switch to manual mode. Go to live view and zoom in all the way using your camera functionality (not lens). Point it to the brightest star, focus by rotating the focus ring manually. Take a few test shots and see stars by zooming all the way into the photograph.
2) Use magic lantern. This software adds mu…

How to locate the milky way for night sky DSLR photography?

Our Earth is part of a huge sized galaxy, known as the Milky Way. Milky Way basically consists of our whole solar system and is made up of 100-400 billion stars. Until last year, I had no idea if we can see Milky Way with naked eyes. After a lot of failed late night drives and sleeping at the beach, I was finally able to get a grip on what I actually need to see Milky Way. In September 2016, I got my first Milky Way shot. It was an extremely emotional and priceless moment when I first saw the magnificent milky way with my own eyes. All the failed attempts or discomfort of not going to bed early seemed nothing in that moment. I would consider sharing this priceless memory with fellow photography folks as the inspiration behind this post. 
Moving on to the technical part, there is a minimal amount of gear required to take Milky Way shots using your dslr. Focusing at infinity and calculating the shutter speed to avoid star trails is purely technical, capturing Milky Way takes a little mor…

Dual memory card slot DSLR vs single memory card slot DSLR

A couple of readers recently sent a message to my Facebook page asking the usage of dual memory card slot DSLR cameras. Most of the professional cameras have dual memory card slots, one as Compact flash card and other as SD card. Some DSLR cameras have dual SD card slot whereas a very few have dual CF card slot. If you are looking for a well known dual memory card slot camera, below list will be helpful. 

Example of dual slot DSLR cameras from Canon include: Canon 1D Mark IV Canon 1D Mark III Canon 1D Mark II Canon 5D Mark III Canon 7D Mark II
Example of dual slot DSLR cameras from Nikon include: Nikon D300S Nikon D3S Nikon D5 Nikon D800 Nikon D800E
Nikon D7000
Example of dual slot DSLR cameras from other manufacturers include:
Pentax 645D
Pentax K-1
Fuji X-T2
Panasonic GH5
Sony A9
Olympus E-M1II

The bigger question here is why do we need dual memory card slot DSLR cameras and what's the advantage? Let's try to find the answer from a user perspective. Professional cameras hav…